The Health Effects of Cannabis – Informed Opinions

Enter canvass opinions and any public or pub place and there’ll be a different view for every person canvassed. Some remarks will be well-informed from respectable sources while others are going to be formed upon no foundation at all. To be sure, conclusions and research based on the research are tough given the long history of illegality. Nevertheless, is a groundswell of opinion that cannabis is good and should be legalized. States in America and Australia have taken the route. Other countries are either following suit or considering options. What is the position? Is it great or not?

The National Academy of Sciences released a 487-page report that this year (NAP Report) about the present state of evidence for the topic matter. Many government grants affirmed the committee, a collection of 16 professors’ work. They were supported by 15 academic reviewers along with some 700 publications. Hence the report is viewed as state of the art on recreational use in addition to medical. This article draws heavily on this resource.

The term cannabis is used broadly here to represent cannabis and marijuana, the latter being sourced from a different part of the plant. Over 100 chemical compounds are present in cannabis, each offering different benefits or threat.


A person who can be”stoned” on smoking cannabis may encounter a euphoric state where time is immaterial, music and colors take on a greater significance and the individual might acquire the”nibblies”, needing to eat fatty and sweet foods. This is frequently related to comprehension and impaired motor skills. When high blood clots have been achieved, paranoid thoughts, hallucinations, and panic attacks may describe his”trip”. Click here to start your project!


In the vernacular, cannabis is often characterized as”good shit” and”bad shit”, reverted to widespread contamination practice. The contaminants may come from soil standard (eg pesticides & heavy metals) or added afterward. Sometimes particles of beads of glass fortify the fat sold.


A random choice of curative effects seems here in the context of their signs standing. Some of the effects will be revealed as beneficial, but some carry risk. Some effects are distinguished by the placebos of the research.

Cannabis in the treatment of epilepsy is inconclusive on account of inadequate evidence.

Nausea and vomiting brought on by chemotherapy may be ameliorated by oral cannabis.

A reduction in the intensity of pain in patients with chronic pain is a likely outcome for the use of cannabis. Take a Cannabis workplace safety course here!

Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients were reported as developments in symptoms.

Increase in appetite and decrease in weight loss in HIV/AIDS patients has been proven in limited evidence.

Based on restricted evidence, cannabis is unsuccessful in treating glaucoma.

On the basis of limited evidence, cannabis is effective in treating Tourette syndrome.

The post-traumatic disorder has been helped by cannabis in a single reported trial.

Restricted statistical evidence points to enhance outcomes for traumatic brain injury.

There is insufficient evidence to claim that cannabis can help Parkinson’s disease.

Limited signs dashed hopes that cannabis could help improve the symptoms of dementia sufferers.

Limited statistical evidence is available to support an association between smoking cannabis and heart attack.

On the basis of limited evidence, cannabis is ineffective to treat depression

The evidence for a reduced risk of metabolic issues (diabetes etc) is restricted and statistical.

Social anxiety disorders can be helped by cannabis, even though the evidence is limited. Asthma and cannabis use isn’t well supported by the evidence either against or for.

The post-traumatic disorder has been aided by cannabis in a single documented trial. Visit Safety Culture Works.

An end which cannabis can help schizophrenia victims can’t be supported or refuted on the grounds of the limited nature of this signs.

There is moderate evidence that greater short-term sleeping results for disturbed sleep folks.

Alcoholism and smoking cannabis are connected with the decreased birth weight of the baby.

The signs for stroke brought on by cannabis use is restricted and statistical.

Addiction to cannabis and gateway problems are complicated, taking into consideration many variables that are beyond the scope of this article. These issues are fully discussed in the NAP report.


The NAP report highlights the following findings on the issue of cancer:

The evidence indicates that smoking cannabis does not raise the risk for certain cancers (i.e., lung, head and neck) in adults.

There is little evidence that cannabis use is associated with a single subtype of testicular cancer.

There is minimal evidence that parental cannabis use during pregnancy is related to greater cancer risk in offspring.


The NAP report highlights the following findings on the Dilemma of respiratory diseases:

Smoking cannabis on a regular basis is associated with a chronic cough and phlegm production.

Quitting cannabis smoking is very likely to reduce a chronic cough and phlegm production.

It’s unclear whether cannabis use is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, asthma, or worsened lung function.


The NAP report highlights the following findings on the Dilemma of the human immune system:

There exists a paucity of information on the consequences of cannabis or cannabinoid-based therapeutics on the individual immune system.

There is insufficient data to draw overarching conclusions concerning the effects of cannabis smoke or cannabinoids on immune tolerance.

There is limited evidence to indicate that routine exposure to cannabis smoke may have anti-inflammatory activity.

There’s inadequate evidence to support or refute a statistical association between cannabis or cannabinoid use and negative impacts on immune status in people with HIV.


The NAP report highlights the following findings on the Dilemma of the increased risk of injury or death:

Cannabis use before driving increases the risk of being involved in an automobile accident.

In states where cannabis use is legal, there’s an elevated probability of accidental cannabis overdose injuries in children.

It’s uncertain whether cannabis use is related to all-cause mortality or with an occupational injury.


The NAP report highlights the following findings on the Dilemma of cognitive performance and psychological health:

Recent cannabis use impairs the operation in cognitive domains of learning, memory, and focus. Recent use may be defined within one day of evaluation as cannabis usage.

A limited number of research suggest there are impairments in cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention in those who have stopped smoking cannabis.

Cannabis use during adolescence is related to impairments in following academic achievement and education, employment and income, and social relationships and social functions.

Cannabis use is likely to increase the possibility of developing schizophrenia and other psychoses; the higher the use, the larger the risk.

In people with schizophrenia and other psychoses, a history of cannabis use could be linked to improved performance on learning and memory tasks.

Cannabis use does not seem to increase the likelihood of developing depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

For people diagnosed with bipolar disorders, near-daily cannabis use could be linked to higher symptoms of bipolar disease compared to nonusers.

Heavy cannabis users are more inclined to report thoughts of suicide than are nonusers.

Regular cannabis use is very likely to increase the potential of creating a social anxiety disorder.

It has to be fairly clear from the foregoing that cannabis is not the magic bullet for all health problems that some good-intentioned but ill-advised advocates of cannabis would have us think. Nevertheless, the product offers much hope. Solid research can help clarify the problems. The NAP report is a good step in the ideal direction. There are many barriers to exploring this drug. In time the benefits and risks will be understood. Confidence in the product will increase and a number of the obstacles, academic and social, will drop by the wayside.